↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for early life in Earth’s oldest hydrothermal vent precipitates

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
544 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1221 Mendeley
Title
Evidence for early life in Earth’s oldest hydrothermal vent precipitates
Published in
Nature, March 2017
DOI 10.1038/nature21377
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew S. Dodd, Dominic Papineau, Tor Grenne, John F. Slack, Martin Rittner, Franco Pirajno, Jonathan O’Neil, Crispin T. S. Little

Abstract

Although it is not known when or where life on Earth began, some of the earliest habitable environments may have been submarine-hydrothermal vents. Here we describe putative fossilized microorganisms that are at least 3,770 million and possibly 4,280 million years old in ferruginous sedimentary rocks, interpreted as seafloor-hydrothermal vent-related precipitates, from the Nuvvuagittuq belt in Quebec, Canada. These structures occur as micrometre-scale haematite tubes and filaments with morphologies and mineral assemblages similar to those of filamentous microorganisms from modern hydrothermal vent precipitates and analogous microfossils in younger rocks. The Nuvvuagittuq rocks contain isotopically light carbon in carbonate and carbonaceous material, which occurs as graphitic inclusions in diagenetic carbonate rosettes, apatite blades intergrown among carbonate rosettes and magnetite-haematite granules, and is associated with carbonate in direct contact with the putative microfossils. Collectively, these observations are consistent with an oxidized biomass and provide evidence for biological activity in submarine-hydrothermal environments more than 3,770 million years ago.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 704 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Russia 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 9 <1%
Unknown 1190 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 228 19%
Student > Bachelor 200 16%
Researcher 163 13%
Student > Master 147 12%
Professor 60 5%
Other 197 16%
Unknown 226 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 299 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 194 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 137 11%
Chemistry 69 6%
Physics and Astronomy 52 4%
Other 181 15%
Unknown 289 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,131
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#107
of 98,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7
of 324,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#2
of 907 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 907 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.